Review Concrete Pavement
Version 7.0.1 Changes
- Disabled the PAR button when the selected row is for a Work Item. PARs and Pay Factors can only be entered against Contract Line Items.
Version 6.4 Changes
- Changed the column heading on the History tab from “Recommended Status” to “Overall Test Result” in an effort to eliminate confusion about which status is recorded on the History.
- Added an edit to ensure the selected/entered concrete mix design is for a concrete class that matches the concrete class of the material being inspected.
Version 6.3 Changes
- Modified the window to default the Required Strength to the value from the previous row when more than one row exists.
Version 6.0 Changes
- The window was modified to require a numeric value for the Lot Number field.
- The Sort and Find functionality is now working correctly where applicable.
Version 5.9 Changes
- A correction has been made to default the Test Result to 'Does Not Meet Specs - Pay Adjustment' when the Average Beam Strength is greater than or equal to 500 and less than 600.
Version 5.8 Changes
- This window has been updated to add a new Material column
to allow for those cases where more than one material on a line item
has a material type with this FIR Concrete Pavement report type.
- A correction was made to the window to display the Comments text for
Inquiry Only users.
- A correction was made to allow multiple comments to be made prior to
saving the record. Previously, an error message displayed, preventing
this action.
- The Flexural Strength tab of this window has been updated to add a
Material column, to assist in selecting a material in those cases
where multiple materials exist on a particular line item.
Version 5.6 Changes
- A correction was made to the window processing to display an error
message (invalid selection) when an expired test category is selected.
Version 5.3 Changes
Added header and CC: information on the report similar to other FIR reports.
Changed the label at the top of the window from UOM
to System since it was referring to whether the contract
was English or Metric. This is consistent with the rest of HiCAMS.
New for Version 5.0
Page last updated 27 May 2008