
|

State Plane Coordinates
vs. Surface Coordinates, Part 6.
by James P. Reilly, Ph.D.
In the last article, I showed how to calculate state plane coordinates in
a state that uses the Lambert conformal projection. In this article, I will calculate the
state plane coordinates for a geodetic control point in a state that uses the transverse
Mercator projection.
The problem is:
Calculate the state plane coordinates for station King whose NAD 27 coordinates are
latitude N40° 43' 37.302"
longitude W88° 41' 35.208"
The station is located in the State of Illinois, state plane zone Illinois
East.
Figure 1 shows the map from the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey manual for the
state of Illinois, also reproduced in Rayner and Schmidt1. Illinois uses the transverse
Mercator projection with two zones, east and west. Each zone has its own axis for y,
although both axes passing through the east and west zones are given an x-value of
500,000'. Both zones use the same x-axis, which is located well below the
southern limit of the state and has a value of zero feet. The central meridian
of the East Zone is 88°20' west longitude; along this line the scale of the projection is
one part in 40,000 parts too small. The lines of exact scale are
parallel to the central meridian and situated approximately 28 miles east
and west. Of course, to the east and west of these lines, the scale is too large. The
parallel of latitude 36°40' defines the x-axis; the origin of coordinates for
the east zone
is a point on the 36°40' parallel situated 500,000'
west of longitude 88°20'.
Lets perform the calculations. Unlike the Lambert projection, there isnt a
sketch that shows the geometric relations between latitude, longitude and x,y. The
equations necessary to perform these calculations are as follows:
x = x' + 500,000 (1)
x = H Dl" +/- a b (2)
y = yo + V ("/100)2 +/- c (3)
Where x' is the distance, the point is either east or west of the central
meridian; yo, H, V and a are quantities based on the geodetic latitude; b and c are based
on Dl" (the difference in longitude of the point from the longitude of the central
meridian, in seconds-of-arc).
Tables are needed to get the values for H, V, a, b, yo and c. Fortunately,
all values can be found in two tables, which are given in the publication for the state of
Illinois; but for this article, Tables 1 and 2 (on page 18) from Rayner and Schmidt are
abstracts of the original tables that cover the values needed to solve our problem.
Repeating the problem:
Given:
Station King
latitude N40° 43' 37.302"
longitude W88° 41' 35.208"
State - Illinois, East Zone
Central Meridian - W88° 20' 00
Solution:
1) Solve for Dl. Since we are in the western hemisphere, all values of longitude are
minus.
Dl" = longitude - central meridian longitude.
Dl = -88° 41' 35.208" - (-88° 20' 00")
Dl = -0° 21' 35.208" = -1,295.208 seconds-of-arc
2) Calculate (Dl"/100)2
(Dl"/100)2 = 167.756
Table 1. Values of H and V Illinois East Zone
Values of H and V Illinois East Zone |
Lat. |
Y0 (feet) |
³Y0 per
second |
H |
³H per
second |
V |
³V per
second |
a |
40°
35'
40° 36'
40° 37'
40° 38'
40° 39'
40° 40'
40° 41'
40° 42'
40° 43'
40° 44'
40° 45'
40° 46'
40° 47'
40° 48'
40° 49'
40° 50'
40° 51'
40° 52'
40° 53'
40° 54' |
1,426,385.98
1,432,457.79
1,438,529.61
1,444,601.45
1,450,673.31
1,456,745.19
1,462,817.08
1,468,888.99
1,474,960.92
1,481,032.87
1,487,104.84
1,493,176.82
1,499,248.82
1,505,320.84
1,511,392.88
1,517,464.93
1,523,537.01
1,529,609.10
1,535,681.20
1,541,753.33 |
101.19683
101.19700
101.19733
101.19767
101.19800
101.19817
101.19850
101.19883
101.19917
101.19950
101.19967
101.20000
101.20033
101.20067
101.20083
101.20133
101.20150
101.20167
101.20217
101.20233 |
77.158010
77.138853
77.119688
77.100517
77.081340
77.062156
77.042965
77.023768
77.004565
76.985354
76.966138
76.946914
76.927685
76.908448
76.889205
76.869956
76.850700
76.831437
76.812168
76.792893 |
319.28
319.42
319.52
319.62
319.73
319.85
319.95
320.05
320.18
320.27
320.40
320.48
320.62
320.72
320.82
320.93
321.05
321.15
321.25
321.38 |
1.216989
1.217100
1.217211
1.217321
1.217431
1.217540
1.217649
1.217757
1.217865
1.217973
1.218080
1.218187
1.218293
1.218399
1.218505
1.218610
1.218715
1.218819
1.218923
1.219027 |
1.85
1.85
1.83
1.83
1.82
1.82
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.78
1.78
1.77
1.77
1.77
1.75
1.75
1.73
1.73
1.73
1.72 |
0.509
0.507
0.505
0.503
0.501
0.499
0.497
0.495
0.493
0.491
0.489
0.487
0.485
0.483
0.481
0.479
0.477
0.475
0.473
0.471 |
Table 2. Values of b and c Illinois Zones
Values
of b and c Illinois Zones |
| Dl |
b |
Db |
c |
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
1,100
1,200
1,300
1,400
1,500
1,600
1,700
1,800
1,900
2,000 |
0.000
+0.212
+0.424
+0.634
+0.842
+1.049
+1.252
+1.453
+1.649
+1.841
+2.028
+2.209
+2.384
+2.553
+2.715
+2.868
+3.014
+3.151
+3.279
+3.397
+3.504 |
+0.212
+0.212
+0.210
+0.208
+0.207
+0.203
+0.201
+0.196
+0.192
+0.187
+0.181
+0.175
+0.169
+0.162
+0.153
+0.146
+0.137
+0.128
+0.118
+0.107
+0.097 |
0.000
0.000
-0.001
-0.002
-0.003
-0.005
-0.007
-0.010
-0.014
-0.018
-0.022
-0.027
-0.032
-0.038
-0.043
-0.049
-0.055
-0.061
-0.067
-0.073
-0.079 |
Table 3. Values of Scale Factors Illinois East Zone
Values
of Scale Factors
Illinois East Zone |
| x (feet) |
Scale in
Units of 7th Place of
Logs |
Scale
Expressed
as a Ratio |
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
55,000
60,000
65,000
70,000
75,000
80,000
85,000
90,000
95,000
100,000
105,000
110,000
115,000
120,000
125,000
130,000
135,000
140,000
145,000 |
-108.6
-108.5
-108.1
-107.5
-106.6
-105.5
-104.1
-102.5
-100.7
-98.5
-96.2
-93.6
-90.7
-87.6
-84.3
-80.7
-76.8
-72.7
-68.4
-63.8
-58.9
-53.9
-48.5
-42.9
-37.1
-31.0
-24.7
-18.1
-11.3
-4.2 |
0.9999750
0.9999750
0.9999751
0.9999752
0.9999755
0.9999757
0.9999760
0.9999764
0.9999768
0.9999773
0.9999778
0.9999784
0.9999791
0.9999798
0.9999806
0.9999814
0.9999823
0.9999833
0.9999843
0.9999853
0.9999864
0.9999876
0.9999888
0.9999901
0.9999915
0.9999929
0.9999943
0.9999958
0.9999974
0.9999990 |
3) From Table 1, interpolate for H, V, yo and a.
The argument for all values is the latitude of the point, 40°43'37.202". From Table
1 we must interpolate between 40° 43' and 40° 44' by the amount 37.202"/60" =
0.6217.
By doing this we get the following:
H = 76.992654
V = 1.217932
a = -0.492
yo = 1,478,725.73.
4) From Table 2, interpolate for b and c.
b = +2.545
c = -0.04
The argument for both values is Dl in seconds-of-arc.
5) Solve for H Dl and a b, which are needed to solve equation (2), given above:
x' = HDl" +/- a b,
HDl" = -99,721.50
a b = -1.25
x = HDl +/- a b = -99,720.25
Note
The sign convention is as follows: when a b is negative, decrease HDl"
numerically. If a b is positive, increase HDl" numerically. Since Dl" is
negative because the station is west of the central meridian, x' is also negative.
6) Solve equation (3),
y = yo + V ( Dl/100)2 +/- c
y = 1,478,930.01 ft.
7) Solve for the scale factor.
The argument for scale factor is x'. Table 3 gives the scale factor for different values
of x'. In our problem,
x' = -99,720.25. The minus sign is not needed for this calculation.
Solution
Scale factor = 0.9999863
As you can see, the calculations on the transverse Mercator grid are more complicated than
calculations on the Lambert grid. However, at most, two conversions are needed for
traversing a small area; after that all calculations are made using plane trigonometry.
Thats what we will discuss in the next column. We are getting close to the end of
this series, at most two more.
Click here to go back to the GPS
Observer menu
¹ Fundamentals of Surveying by William H. Rayner and Milton O. Schmidt, Van
Nostrand Reinhold company, 1963.
James P. Reilly serves as head of the Department of Surveying at New Mexico State
University, College of Engineering, in Las Cruces.
|